At 01:52 AM 9/10/00 -0400, Douglas Berger wrote: >>> It probably is related to submitters putting your name and address in the form. *** Oh, of course -- I could kick myself for not thinking of that. :-\ Thanks, Doug. >>> I got double e-mails for my sites I put in my ring. One went to me as ringmaster and one went to the addy I used when signing up. *** Ours is a small ring so I suppose I could have entered the form data for all my members and emailed their code, as some of you have mentioned doing, but felt I should give them a choice about tagging along because it's technically not the same ring. Left our old one intact at Yahoo (with membership closed) and started from scratch here, using a dual home page in hopes of letting the assimilated Yahoo ring serve as a *portal* for the new Ringlink ring. :) I'm so glad for the opportunity to be getting in on the ground floor of this exciting up 'n' coming movement, and I hope it spreads like wildfire! Which reminds me, I know nothing of the logistics but am wondering if there's a possibility of the various Ringlink systems pooling resources when stats become available? I always relied on that criteria to determine whether a ring looked healthy before deciding to join. Pete's directory is off to a great start, but what an impact it might make if all Ringlink rings could share a central jumping-off place. Is that what you have in mind for ringlink.org, Gunnar? Mary Partners in Rhyme, a Ringlink Project http://tenderbytes.net/rhymeworld/webring.htm Simple words in metered rhyme Brave the rugged test of time.