Re: NT-Perl from activestate.com

["lists at canonical.net" <lists@canonical.net>]

So. . .
Is this a yes, but only if. . .?
Or a yes, and by the way, you should also have. . .?
I know nothing of NT and I'm a little confused.
Thanks!
Rachelle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Clark" <jay.clark@rotor.com>
To: <ringlinklist@gunnar.cc>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: [ringlinklist] NT-Perl from activestate.com
>
> Yes Ringlinks runs under ActiveStates Perl. But your server needs to have
a
> sendmail port for NT. If a lot of people are running under NT without
> sendmail I would be glad to change the code for those people but it is
just
> easier to get the sendmail port.
>
>
> Jay Clark
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pauli Smith" <paulismith@earthlink.net>
> To: <ringlinklist@gunnar.cc>
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 5:54 PM
> Subject: [ringlinklist] NT-Perl from activestate.com
>
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm new to the list and to CGI-bins and the such so bear with me please.
I
> > asked my server if they would support RingLink and this is their
response:
> >
> > We support NT-Perl from activestate.com.
> > Check with the maker of RingLink if it runs under this version of perl
> >
> > So I guess my first question to the list is does RingLink support this
> > version of Perl?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
> > spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
> > questions about this message. MailShield product info:
www.mailshield.com