Re: Re: NETFIRMS - EMAIL Fault for ringlink??

["Curt E. Angeledes" <ceacmg@efn.org>]

Hi Chuck,
Try these guys---www.addr.com. Everything you could want in a server:
FP extensions, SSL, complete shell access, at least 70 megs of space, cgi/perl5,
excellent tech support, *immediate usability*, on the "backbone", and currently
$7.95 a month (when I joined 2 years ago it was $14.95 a month). I have sent
many people there and have never had any tell me about any problems!! I
installed the ringlink system, with customization in less that 10 minutes and it
all works just fine even *sendmail*.
Curt E. Angeledes
Now a member of Because_Webring_Is_Broken
Also accepting new rings at
http://www.chief-moons-gallery.com/cmgrinklink.html
Chuck Baslock wrote:
> I hate to say this but at this point in time, I don't believe it "stopped"
> working.
> I believe it was disabled on purpose.
> I no longer believe that netfirms can/or intends to provide the necessary
> support we need(another Y!Webring?).
>
> I'm going to look for another ISP.
>
> Chuck
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Gwozdz" <smage@together.net>
> To: <ringlinklist@gunnar.cc>
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 10:40 PM
> Subject: RE: [ringlinklist] Re: NETFIRMS - EMAIL Fault for ringlink??
>
> >
> > I just sent a note to tech support as mine has stopped working too..
> >
> > Daniel Gwozdz
> > The Water-Cooled Volkswagen Ring - http://www.wcvw.org
> >
> > > >>>Above facility via send mail in cgi-bin does not appear
> > > to have been operational from Netfirms for last 2 days
> > > (since 18th September 2000) Anyone else had problems
> > > please?? No problem re ringlink BEFORE this date.
> > > I have two sites showing as being in queue, but received no
> > > emails informing me of this. Have reported possible fault to Netfirms
> > >  >>>
> > >
> > > I was having problem with it for two days before that (the 16th). I've
> > > asked their tech support about  it, but no reply yet. Chuck Baslock also
> > > has. No reply yet either, but other questions I've asked were handled
> > > promptly. I can only guess they're trying to fix  it.
> > > I also tried using different email addresses. Apparently that didn't
> > > work either.