>>Extrapolate further to your 80,000 hits/8 weeks it would be about 1Mb/day (without serving navbars. . ). << Thank you Jock for your input. This amount of pull appears to be a reasonable figure that shouldn't upset my host and eases my mind. :) Barbara ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jock Dempsey" <guru@anvilfire.com> To: <ringlinklist@gunnar.cc> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 12:14 PM Subject: [ringlinklist] RE: System Resources > > Traffic Bandwidth Report: > > This embarassingly low traffic report may give you a hint of real server > load. This traffic is generated by approximately 20 sites (out of 150 in > the process of moving). This is a 22 day report (starting from ground > zero). This ring HAD 18,000 hits per 8 week period before Black Tuesday. > The new ring is only seeing 6% of the old traffic :( > > Extrapolated to full function this ring with 100 members will create 650kb > per month traffic. Microscopic traffic on a server that sees 300+ Mb per day. > > Extrapolate further to your 80,000 hits/8 weeks it would be about 1Mb/day > (without serving navbars. . ). I think I got that right the third time. . . > > We are doing some things differently than most Ringlink systems. We are > serving javascript and graphics the same as Yahoo. That appears to > represent aproximately half the total. There will also be banners on the > list page that we will be serving but are currently from off site. > > ----------------------------------------------- > Average successful requests for pages per day: 19 (18) [really sad] > Distinct files requested: 260 (121) > Distinct hosts served: 2,380 (1,210) > Data transferred: 27.940 Mbytes (9.303 Mbytes) > Average data transferred per day: 1.270 Mbytes (1.329 Mbytes) > > reqs: %bytes: file type > ----: ------: --------- > 2247: 47.60%: .pl > 6689: 32.32%: .js > 709: 5.86%: .jpg [JPEG graphics] > 285: 5.00%: .htm [Hypertext Markup Language] > 734: 4.68%: .gif [GIF graphics] > 140: 3.62%: [directories] > 569: 0.78%: .css > 12: 0.13%: .html [Hypertext Markup Language] > 8: 0.02%: [not listed: 3 extensions] > > reqs: %bytes: directory > ----: ------: --------- > 2247: 47.60%: /cgi-bin/ > 5753: 39.50%: /data/ > 414: 7.45%: [root directory] > 680: 3.14%: /images/ > 1717: 1.21%: /adverts/ > 565: 0.77%: /include/ > 17: 0.32%: /misc/ > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The "file ID in use" question. Is it possible that some other file error > is being generated and Ringlink is resolving to "in use"? I would also > wonder about the specific file names in use. Leading spaces, illegal char > or breaks in the filename might return bad results. > > Jock D.