Daniel Gwozdz wrote: > > One of the scripts I was looking at uses a .cgi extension on all > it's data files so they aren't viewable from the web. > > Does that sound feasible? I see the point, but .cgi extensions indicate that files are executable, and since that's not the case with the data files, it wouldn't be a very "clean" solution. Besides, it would require changes in the program which would make the new version non-compatible with previous versions, and thus rather complicated to implement. What's wrong with the solutions described at http://rachelle.net/ringlink/miscellany.html#7 ? / Gunnar