Just something I saw. I guess I mentioned it for reasons of ease of installation for the user, since .cgi files in a cgi directory are never web-viewable (in other words, a universal solution.) Ah well. The non-compatibility had occurred to me. Like I said, just a thought. Daniel Gwozdz The Water-Cooled Volkswagen Ring - http://www.wcvw.org > > > > One of the scripts I was looking at uses a .cgi extension on all > > it's data files so they aren't viewable from the web. > > > > Does that sound feasible? > > I see the point, but .cgi extensions indicate that files are executable, > and since that's not the case with the data files, it wouldn't be a very > "clean" solution. Besides, it would require changes in the program which > would make the new version non-compatible with previous versions, and > thus rather complicated to implement. > > What's wrong with the solutions described at > http://rachelle.net/ringlink/miscellany.html#7 ?