Re: Release of Ringlink 1.1

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson <mailbox@gunnar.cc>]

Hi Pam,
Thanks for reporting your observations. Besides a few general remarks
at http://www.gunnar.cc/ringlink/mailarc/msg01094.html, a few comments
follow below:
Pamster wrote:
> 
> I only checked for "Next" link, cause I thought it might not take
> so long to check if that's all it was checking.
I think that the difference due to how many links it checks is
negligible.
> I had changed the URLS for the sites so that the html & entrance
> URLs were the same...
Why?
> Some sites that failed that should have passed:
> ...
> Site ID: 17 | Site title: New Art
> http://members.fortunecity.com/princess_elki1/newart.html
> - Next-link missing or incorrect
I noticed that there are linebreaks after the question marks in the
links, and I have made changes in the script which should deal with
that; maybe this will make a difference.
> Does it mess the checker up if the same URL is in both URL fields?
No.
> Beta-tester extraordinare!!  ;-)
Unfortunately the need for it is bigger than I had anticipated. Again,
thanks!
/ Gunnar