RE: Ringlink 1.1 checker

["Pamster" <pam@pamster.com>]

Well, I was thinking of it terms of the amount of time it takes to check a
large ring.  If I just checked 25 sites, if a few of them failed, I could be
checking them while the checker was checking the next 25 sites...
Pam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ringlinklist@1-host.com
> [mailto:owner-ringlinklist@1-host.com]On Behalf Of Gunnar Hjalmarsson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 1:00 PM
> To: ringlinklist@gunnar.cc
> Subject: Re: [ringlinklist] Ringlink 1.1 checker
>
>
>
> Pamster wrote:
> >
> > A suggested enhancement for the checker - provide the ability to
> > check just a portion of the ring - like sites 1-25.  We have 215
> > sites in the ring - and it takes so long to run - and then the
> > results list is kind of hard to deal with.
>
> If we make the checker work more accurate, the need for this feature
> would be reduced, wouldn't it? Anyway, I'll consider it.
>
> / Gunnar