Pamster wrote: > > I have a smaller ring, about 11 sites. First time through ~ 11 > sites failed. I fixed the four of them, reran the checker, and all > passed except the first 2 (which are on that addr.com server that > returns the strange responses you were mentioning.) Weird. Jock's idea about letting the program record which sites actually were checked appears to be more and more important. / Gunnar