[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Version 1.11



Pamster wrote:
> 
> Some nice features in 1.11 - especially the ability to check a part
> of the ring - I really appreciate that.
I'm glad you do. ;-)
> When I first ran the checker, I was getting a lot of "Unable to
> read URL" failures - the Details page said that some of those are
> 500 timeouts...
I might have made a mistake as regards the timeout setting. It's set to
10 seconds. I suggest that you go to line 1,222 in the ring.pm file
("sub checksites" at the bottom of the file) and change it to something
longer, e.g.
    $useragent -> timeout (30);
Please let us know whether that makes a difference.
> Would it be possible to differentiate the message that's
> displayed - so that the same message wouldn't be displayed for
> both of the statuses?
Yes, actually it was differentiated in (the adjusted) version 1.1, and
I'll fix something similar in the next version.
> I'm getting some of these:
> 
> Site ID: 69 | Site title: HarleyAngels haven
> http://www.angelfire.com/ak/harleyangel/Rings.html
>  - Next-link missing or incorrect
>  - Random-link missing or incorrect
>  - List-link missing or incorrect
>  - Home-link missing or incorrect
>  - Previous-link missing or incorrect
> Deactivate | Edit | Remove - HarleyAngel
> yet, on the details page - it appears that the code is there...
> Is it because the line is broken and the " isn't after the 69?
> Only thing that I could figure.
No, it should work despite of that (see
http://www.gunnar.cc/ringlink/mailarc/msg01100.html). Is the status code
at the details page something else than 200? If not, I have no
explanation right now.
Thanks for your comments, Pam.
/ Gunnar

Follow-Ups from:
"Pamster" <pam@pamster.com>

References to:
"Pamster" <pam@pamster.com>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]