Re: Checker

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson <mailbox@gunnar.cc>]

Greta wrote:
> 
> I changed it to 30 and it seems to work better. But if I change
> to 60 what's happen then? I am curious to try..
There is no reason not to try.
I have no firm idea about the ideal timeout setting, and I'd appreciate
your comments. I guess, though, that the setting in the original program
should be a sort of compromise. On one hand we don't want that too many
sites fail due to the timeout setting, but on the other hand, if we
accept the checker to try too long, the risk increases that the whole
operation is disrupted due to browser timeout. Btw, anyone who knows a
more efficient way to avoid a browser timeout?
/ Gunnar