RE: Checker investigation [was: Re: Version 1.11]

["Pamster" <pam@pamster.com>]

Hmmm - if it was a timeout, wouldn't the Details page have given me the
timeout message, instead of displaying the page with the fragment?
I agree about XOOM and TRIPOD - I'd consider GO network, too.  Half the time
they're "too busy".
Pam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ringlinklist@1-host.com
> [mailto:owner-ringlinklist@1-host.com]On Behalf Of Jock Dempsey
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 11:40 AM
> To: ringlinklist@gunnar.cc
> Subject: [ringlinklist] Checker investigation [was: Re: Version 1.11]
>
>
>
> pamster wrote:
>
> >> http://www.angelfire.com/ak/harleyangel/Rings.html
> >> Passed
>
> > Still fails for me - grabs the page with the fragment.
>
> Its probably a timeout problem.  I just tried to access the page with a
> browser and it took WELL OVER 30 seconds before the page loaded.  20 of it
> was the darn POP-UP.
>
> I also tried the next page.  It took even longer.  I have TWO sites that
> are on both my metalworking rings that are hosted on Tripod.  Sometimes
> they pass sometimes they fail.  They failed 100% with the Webring.org
> checker, 50% of the time with Web-Ring Checker and only about 10% of the
> time with Ringlink. . .  I just KNOW which sites are going to fail every
> time and ignore the error. .
>
> I have two future rings planned and the rules are going to say:
>
> NO XOOM, NO TRIPOD, No others with pop-ups or banner shells. .
>
> Jock Dempsey
> webmaster@anvilfire.com