That is what I thought. Maybe I don't have the link set up properly. I see it is different then yours. http://www.d-r-d.com/cgi-bin/ringlink/home.pl?ringid=disabilities ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pamster" <pam@pamster.com> To: <ringlinklist@gunnar.cc> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 12:02 AM Subject: RE: [ringlinklist] Checker investigation [was: Re: Version 1.11] > > I thought it was checking for a link to home for the ring - like this: > > <a > href="http://www.futurecomputers.net/ringhost/cgi-bin/ringlink/home.cgi?ring > id=141618;siteid=1" target="_top">Home</a> > > Pam > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ringlinklist@1-host.com > > [mailto:owner-ringlinklist@1-host.com]On Behalf Of Chuck Baslock > > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 9:40 PM > > To: ringlinklist@gunnar.cc > > Subject: Re: [ringlinklist] Checker investigation [was: Re: Version > > 1.11] > > > > > > > > Receiving "Home" link missing. > > Which "Home" is the checker checking for. > > I have my Ringlink home page linked. > > The Ringlink System is the Home of the System itself but not the > > Home Page of the Ring. > > > > Chuck > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Gunnar Hjalmarsson" <mailbox@gunnar.cc> > > To: <ringlinklist@gunnar.cc> > > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 3:10 PM > > Subject: Re: [ringlinklist] Checker investigation [was: Re: Version 1.11] > > > > > > > > > > Pamster wrote: > > > > > > > > Why would sites pass for you and fail for me? > > > > > > Jock Dempsey wrote: > > > > > > > > Its probably a timeout problem. > > > > > > Pamster wrote: > > > > > > > > Hmmm - if it was a timeout, wouldn't the Details page have given > > > > me the timeout message, instead of displaying the page with the > > > > fragment? > > > > > > There is one difference between Pam's and my checking: I pick up pages > > > that were prepared in advance, while parts of the sites are generated > > > when using the original URLs. The new checker seems to be able to handle > > > some kind of dialogue with the servers, and one possibility is that the > > > dialogue in connection with a more complicated generated page disturbs > > > the process... But I don't find this explanation very logical, since the > > > checker still grabs the correct info. > > > > > > I agree with Jock that some of the free services are a nuisance on the > > > web. But like Pam I don't believe that timeout is the explanation > > > either. Please note that the checker doesn't load images in a browser or > > > execute JavaScripts etc.; it just reads the code in plain text format. > > > So timeout in this respect is more about connecting to a server than > > > loading a lot of "cool stuff". > > > > > > So, what is it then? One thing I have come to think about is that the > > > problems might be related to Fawnna's server, e.g. an unreliable Perl > > > version or insufficient "power" to execute the demanding checker script > > > accurately. > > > > > > But I don't know. > > > > > > / Gunnar