Re: Source of quote

[Alicia <aroman1@towson.edu>]

Peter Flom wrote:
> 
> I remember reading a quote which was attributed to one of the early 20th 
>century physicists (I forget which one), it was something along the lines of
> "When we wish to understand the sentence 'one and one equals two' it is not 
>enough to understand 'one' and 'two'; we must also understand 'and' and 
>'equals'"  but that's not it exactly.
> 
> Any help appreciated
> 
> Peter
> 
i don't think this is your quote but i found a similar one...
"2 is not equal to 3, not even for large values of 2."  ~Grabel's Law
`licia
-- 
vi's qP:  http://neptune.spaceports.com/~vi/